Committee on Public Safety

Thursday, July 16, 2026, 10:30 a.m. (New York City time), 250 Broadway - 8th Floor - Hearing Room 1

Committee: Committee on Public Safety

Video of the meeting

On the agenda

Documents

Transcript

0:01 This? No. All right. Are w

0:01 eready in the back one second.

0:47 Okay. Ow! Ow, ow, ow, ow

0:51 ! Good morning and welcome t

0:54 othis near to the council vote

0:56 on public safety at this time

0:58 we're asking everyone pieces

0:59 started all electronic device

1:00 and at no time anyone should

1:02 approach this, you begin

1:07 . Good morning. I am council

1:07 member Oswald felice of the

1:09 committee on public safety. I

1:11 am joined by committee members

1:13 Thomas Henry, Justin Sanchez

1:15 tie Hankerson hank's Banks for

1:18 areas one also online areola

1:21 council members and Nurse

1:25 .today, the committee will vote

1:25 on proposals introduction

1:26 number 9 13, a sponsored by

1:29 Council Member corey us. This

1:30 bill would demand the

1:31 administrative code of the

1:32 City of New York to raise the

1:34 maximum age for individuals

1:35 taking a civil service

1:37 examination to become a police

1:40 officer from under 35 years of

1:41 age two under 43 years of age

1:45 .the bill would also allow

1:45 individuals who have served

1:46 them on military duty or

1:47 terminal leave to sub strapped

1:50 to subtract up to six years of

1:51 service time from the age for

1:53 purposes of eligibility this

1:57 like this legislation would

1:58 allow New York city's age

2:00 requirements with recent

2:01 changes madeo th se New York

2:02 state civil service law and

2:04 expand the pool of candidates

2:07 eligible to take the police,

2:08 the police civil service

2:12 examination as the nypd

2:12 continuous efforts to recruit,

2:14 and it retain qualified

2:17 officers expanding pathways

2:18 into public service help

2:20 provide additional

2:21 opportunities for individuals

2:22 with valuable life and

2:24 professional experience to

2:25 pursue a career in law

2:28 enforcement.

2:29 The bill also recognizes the

2:30 contributions of individuals

2:31 who have served in the

2:32 military by accounting for

2:34 time spent on active duty when

2:36 determining the age related

2:37 requirements. I'll pass it on

2:39 to a Council Member areas for

2:41 her opening.

2:41 Statement. Thank you. Chair

2:42 for lease for the opportunity

2:44 to speak before the committee

2:45 on public safety about my bill

2:46 introduction 9 13 a. The

2:49 impetus for intro 9 13 8 cam

2:50 efrom conversations with my

2:52 local precinct council about

2:53 the barriers that be

2:55 discouraging qualified New

2:55 yorkers from pursuing a career

2:57 with the nypd almost over a

2:59 year ago, we took a closer

3:01 look at where candidates were

3:02 being lost in the hiring

3:04 process over the last several

3:05 years. Hundreds were unable to

3:07 complete that process because

3:07 they were exceeded the maximum

3:10 age of 35 before their

3:12 appointments were finalized

3:13 and that figure doesn't even

3:14 account for the New yorkers

3:16 who never applied because they

3:17 believe the opportunity was

3:18 already closed to them. Intro

3:21 9 13, I would raise the

3:22 maximum age to take the New

3:23 York City police officers,

3:25 civil service examination from

3:27 35 to under 43, it would also

3:30 preserve the existing

3:30 consideration for eligible

3:32 military service by allowing

3:33 candidates to deduct up to six

3:34 years of active duty service

3:36 or terminal leave when

3:38 determining their eligibility

3:39 as we developed the bill I

3:40 worked closely with our bill

3:41 drafters to ensure the

3:43 language fit within the City'

3:44 sexisting hiring and retirement

3:46 framework candidates we still

3:47 need to pass the civil service

3:49 examination complete the

3:50 background investigation, meet

3:52 all applicable physical,

3:54 medical, psychological,

3:55 educational and character

3:56 requirements and successfully

3:57 complete police academy

4:00 training

4:00 . We also intentionally

4:01 established the New

4:02 eligibility age at under 43 in

4:04 order to remain consistent

4:05 with the city's existing

4:07 retirement framework and allow

4:08 successful candidates the

4:09 opportunity to complete a full

4:11 career in the department while

4:13 remaining compatible with

4:15 current position eligibility

4:16 requirements. The legislation

4:17 also makes clear that

4:19 candidates must supply before

4:20 the 43 birthday unless they

4:22 qualify for the existing

4:23 military service age deduction

4:27 . Working people spend years

4:27 building careers supporting

4:28 their families serving in the

4:30 military pursuing an education

4:31 and caring for loved ones,

4:33 those responsibilities kind

4:34 affect when someone is

4:35 positioned to pursue a New

4:38 profession,

4:38 also developing the maturit

4:39 y, discipline, judgment and

4:40 experience they can bring t

4:41 opublic service by raising the

4:43 examination age. We can expand

4:46 access to stable public

4:47 service careers support the

4:49 nypd's brought a recruitment

4:50 efforts and allow the City to

4:52 consider a wider, more diverse

4:53 pool of qualified candidates

4:55 while continuing to hold every

4:56 applicant to the same

4:57 standards. I'm proud of be

5:00 advancing introduction 9 1

5:00 3aid today. Thank you to the

5:01 members of the committee for

5:03 considering this bill and I

5:04 respectfully urge all of my

5:05 colleagues to vote yesterday.

5:06 Thank you, chair.

5:10 Thank you, councilmember and

5:11 I'll pass it on to the clerk

5:15 for the vote. Thank you. Good

5:16 morning, william martin

5:17 committee clark roll call vote

5:18 committee on public safety

5:19 proposed introduction 9 1 3 a

5:21 chair. Police I Gutiérrez, I

5:33 thank you, Hanks Nurse about I

5:43 thank you, Banks. I am.

5:44 Congratulations to you, Amanda

5:52 Hankerson, I Sanchez I, wang,

5:59 are you alone

6:01 , but I thank you with the

6:02 vote of nine in the

6:04 affirmative in the negative

6:04 and no abstentions item has

6:06 been approved by the committee

6:07 chair that is a full committee

6:11 . Thank you. Thank you so much

6:12 . Thank you, everyone the bill

6:12 passes this hearing is